LM3 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

LM3 - Assignment Example The major characteristics that make it difficult to define leadership include; people from both public and private organization barely know the components of leadership whether it exist or it doesn’t. According to Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, p-189 â€Å"leadership is becoming one of the most widely debated but least clearly understood concepts† Secondly people have not yet understood that leadership has become so dynamic whereby, society has been described as â€Å"highly turbulent subject to sudden and dramatic shift† (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp-189). Thirdly, people have not yet understood leadership requires corporation among all the concern parties, whereby, according to Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp-190, â€Å"Moreover, clients or citizens also want to participate, as well they should†. Additionally, lack some aspect of creativity and innovativeness with respect to leadership style has made it quite challenging to define leaders hip (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp-190-192). This is because leadership style that may be applied in a particular organization may not be effective in another organization. Additionally, different organizations have different structures and may require different leadership styles (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp-189-195). In above connection, future leadership is more of a shared process because current leadership was build based on the past leadership theories. This is according to Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, p-190 â€Å"we need to understand how leadership has been studied and practiced in the past†. Therefore, through past leadership, future leadership can have a reference point as well as a fundamental base of formulating the appropriate leadership styles to be applied in future organizations (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp 189-192). However, it is important to consider that â€Å"leadership is changing in many ways, and we should be attentive to those changes† (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp-190). In above connection, it can be scrutinized that, â€Å"In the past, a leader was considered the person who held a formal position of power in an organization or a society† (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, p-190). However, through evolution of leadership, people have come to understand that leadership is a process that requires corporation and integration among all people within and outside the organization (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp190-193).Additionally, leadership has taken a certain angle, whereby, decision makers should not only involve people from top management but should also involve those from lower levels of management (Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp 190-195).This is because when everybody is involved in decision making, people feel that they own those decision(Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp 190-195 2. How to our text authors define â€Å"moral imagination†? When is this t o be used? Why? What does it involve? The author has employed the concept of moral imagination to explain what moral leadership entails as well as moral issues. According to Denhardt, Denhardt & Aristigueta, pp 224-225, moral imagination entails â€Å"not just heightening attention to moral con-cerns, but rather carefully and thoughtfully understanding and evaluating